A Study Comparing Tarlatamab, Durvalumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide versus Durvalumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide in First-line Extensive Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC)DeLLphi-312
Study Details
The main objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of tarlatamab in combination with durvalumab, carboplatin and etoposide to the combination of durvalumab, carboplatin and etoposide on prolonging overall survival (OS).
Protocol Summary
Overall Survival (OS)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 3.5 years
Progression free survival (PFS) (Blinded Independent Central Review [BICR] Assessed)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 3.5 years
PFS (Investigator Assessed)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 4 years
Objective Response (OR)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 4 years
Disease Control
Timeframe: Up to approximately 4 years
Duration of Response (DOR)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 4 years
PFS Rate
Timeframe: 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
OS Rate
Timeframe: 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
Time to Progression
Timeframe: Up to approximately 4 years
Number of Participants Who Experience Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 4 years
Number of Participants Who Experience Treatment-related Adverse Events
Timeframe: Up to approximately 4 years
Number of Participants Who Experience Events of Interest
Timeframe: Up to approximately 4 years
Serum Concentrations of Tarlatamab
Timeframe: Up to approximately 1 year
Number of Participant Who Develop Anti-Tarlatamab Antibodies
Timeframe: Up to 13 months